Back to GEOMETRY GARRET
ROUNDEST POLYHEDRA
Alan H. Schoen
Comments are welcome!
Nested pair of truncated icosahedra, (sculptor unknown)
Photographed by Reiko Takasawa Schoen in Madison Square Park, New York City, October 21, 2012
THIS SITE IS CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION.
A0. Random Polyhedral Honeycomb
The fifteen convex cells in this packing are the Voronoi polyhedra of
fifteen points located at random positions in the central region of a sea
of more than one hundred random points. The computer program used
to carry out the calculations was designed by the author and was coded
in FORTRAN by Randall Lundberg in 1969. In 1971, Robert Fuller
constructed this vinyl model.
I DREW MOST OF THE COMPUTER
IMAGES BELOW USING COORDINATE
DATA PROVIDED BY WAYNE DEETER.
I THANK HIM FOR HIS GENEROSITY!
A1. Roundest Polyhedra
The theory of roundest polyhedra (sometimes called best polyhedra)
was first treated by Simon Antoine Jean L'Huilier (1750-1840). One
of several accomplishments for which L'Huilier is remembered today
is his generalization to non-convex polyhedra of the famous formula
of Euler for convex polyhedra, which Euler first described in 1750 in
a letter to Goldbach:v - e + f = 2; v, e, and f are the numbers of vertices, edges, and faces, respectively.
The history of this development is summarized in George G. Szpiro's
fascinating book, "Poincaré's Prize".
Mathematicians refer to the subject of roundest polyhedra as
'The Isoperimetric Problem for Polyhedra'.In the 19th century the theory of roundest polyhedra was investigated
by Jakob Steiner, E. Kötter, Lorenz Lindelöf, and Hermann Minkowski,
and in the 20th century by Ernst Steinitz, Michael Goldberg, and Victor Klee.Lorenz Lindelöf proved a fundamental theorem about roundest polyhedra
(cf. my 1986 conference paper) — first in 1869 and again in 1899. In 1986
Klee greatly deepened the analysis and extended it to dimensions beyond three.
Jakob Steiner (1796-1863) Lorenz Lindelöf (1827-1908) Hermann Minkowski (1864-1909)
Georgy Voronoy (1868-1908) Ernst Steinitz (1871-1928) Victor Klee (1925-2007)
In 2011, Ms. Ivonne Vetter, a staff member at the Mathematisches
Forschungsinstitut Oberwohlfach, noticed that Lorenz Lindelöf's
picture was missing from the pantheon above. She kindly emailed
me the splendid Lindelöf photo from the Oberwohlfach archives
that you now see here. Thanks, Ivonne!I regret that unlike Paul Halmos (1916-2006), I never made it a
practice to snap a photo of every mathematician I met. As a
consequence, I have no photo of Michael Goldberg. If someone
will be kind enough to send me one, I'll be happy to post it.
The Finnish topologist Ernst Leonard Lindelöf (1870-1946)
was the son of Lorenz Lindelöf. He was principally a
topologist and complex analyst. Today he is much better
known than his father. (It appears that he never published
anything about the isoperimetric problem for polyhedra.)
The problem of roundest polyhedra in R3 is: Which convex polyhedron with n faces
has the smallest value of the ratio A 3/V 2?
(A = surface area and V = volume.)
A 3/V 2 is called the isoperimetric quotient and will be abbreviated
here as IQ. Because it is dimensionless, it is independent of scale.In 1897, Minkowski proved the existence of a roundest polyhedron
for every n ≥ 4. In 1899 it was proved by Lorenz Lindelöf that a
necessary condition for a polyhedron P to be roundest is thatP circumscribes a sphere
tangent to the faces of P at
their respective centroids.For a polyhedron circumscribed about the unit sphere, A/V = 27V = 9A.
Hence minimizing A 3/V 2 is equivalent to minimizing A (or V).It has been conjectured — but never proved — that the roundest
polyhedron is always simple, i.e., that its vertices are all of degree three.
I learned a little about roundest polyhedra in 1972 when I watched Klee's
two films about geometry, 'Shapes of the Future — Some Unsolved Problems
in Geometry'. In 1975, Prof. Klee (1925-2007) gave me copies of the filmscript
booklets for these two films, Part I: Two Dimensions and Part II: Three Dimensions.
With the permission of the Mathematical Association of America, I have made
digital copies of these films and uploaded them to YouTube:Part I: Two Dimensions (YouTube video)
and
Part II: Three Dimensions. (YouTube video)
When I read Klee's booklet for Part II, I found the "attractive conjecture" he describes
in the next-to-last paragraph of page 5 to be implausible. (That page is reproduced below.)
I then confirmed by calculation that although Klee's conjecture does hold for n < 8, it is
false for n = 8, i.e., the polar of Berman and Hanes' 8-vertex polyhedron is not tangent
to the unit sphere at face centroids (cf. my scrawled comment at the bottom of page 5).
Page 5 of Victor Klee's booklet for Part II, which
includes his 'attractive' (but false) conjecture.Below are stereoscopic images of the polyhedra for
— shown in red — 4 ≤ n ≤ 35
n = 4
n = 5
n = 6
n = 7
n = 8
n = 8
I met Michael Goldberg several times at AMS meetings in the late sixties. We
discussed minimal surfaces and Voronoi polyhedra, but unfortunately he never
brought up the subject of roundest polyhedra, in which I had a growing interest.
Like Victor Klee, Michael was an unusually modest man. I greatly regret that
he never mentioned to me either of his groundbreaking publications about polyhedra:'The Isoperimetric Problem for Polyhedra' (1934)
and
'A Class of Multisymmetric Polyhedra' (1937).In 1985 I discovered Goldberg's 1935 article, but only in 1991, when I bought
Ian Stewart's wonderfully witty book about mathematics, "Game, Set, and Math",
did I learn of Michael's 1937 article introducing what are now called Goldberg
polyhedra, a class of polyhedra based on the regular icosahedron.Donald Caspar and Aaron Klug independently rediscovered Goldberg polyhedra
in 1962. They are related to the structure of several common viruses and are described
in the Caspar-Klug publication, "Physical Principles in the Construction of Regular
Viruses", Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 27, pp. 1-24 (cf. VIRUSWORLD).
My computational geometry 1986 IBM conference paper,
'A Defect-Correction Algorithm for Minimizing the Volume
of a Simple Polyhedron Which Circumscribes a Sphere',summarizes my 1986 computer investigation of roundest polyhedra.
Conjectured solutions for 4 ≤ n ≤ 35 and for n = 42 are described and
illustrated. Shortly before the conference, I issued a supplement that includes
conjectured solutions for 36 ≤ n ≤ 41 and n = 43. (This supplement also
contains William Tutte's analysis of the asymptotic number of
simple polyhedra as a function of the number n of faces.)
I made final runs in late 1986 and obtained solutions for n = 45, 46, and 47.
Among the most interesting results of this study were
(a) the discovery of the first example (n = 25) of an
asymmetric polyhedron I conjectured to be roundest;
(b) the discovery of the first example (n = 33) of a
polyhedron— also conjectured to be roundest —
that contains a heptagon.(c) additional data that support a discovery I made in 1975,
proving the falsity of a conjecture of Victor Klee.
Klee conjectured that for every n>=4, Qn, the roundest
polyhedron, and Pn, the polyhedron of maximum volume
among all polyhedra with n vertices inscribed in the sphere, are
what I will call strictly dual, i.e. that the vertices of Pn
coincide with the face centroids of Qn.
Schlegel diagram Convex hullNeil Sloane's Q9, the arrangement of nine points on the unit
sphere S for which the convex hull has maximum volume.
Schlegel diagram Convex hull
The polyhedron P9, which is found to have minimum volume
among all 9-faced polyhedra that circumscribe the unit sphere S
Edge skeleton of the inscribed polyhedron Q9
Edge skeleton of Q122, a simplicial polyhedron with
122 vertices, 362 edges, and 240 faces. Q122 has full
icosahedral symmetry. (Discovered by Neil Sloane et al)Q122 is found to have the largest volume among
polyhedra with 122 vertices that are inscribed
in the unit sphere. It is the topological dual of a
Goldberg polyhedron P122 that in 2015 was
found by Wayne Deeter to have the smallest
volume among polyhedra with 122 faces that
are circumscribed about the unit sphere.
The inscribed polyhedron Q122 (a Goldberg polyhedron)
Pied tiling of Q122
It has 240 triangle faces: 60 yellow, 120 green, and 60 red.
The ratios of the triangle areas are [approximately]
yellow : green : red = 1 : 1.125 : 1.148.
Q122 — nested rings (axial view)
Q122 — nested rings (oblique view)
Schlegel diagram of Q122
Schlegel diagram of the circumscribed polyhedron P122
Schlegel diagram of the circumscribed polyhedron P122
The blue polyhedron P8, which has eight faces, is shown here circumscribed about the unit
sphere. A second polyhedron Q8, which has eight vertices, is shown inscribed in the same
sphere. In 1967, Joel Berman and Kit Hanes proved that Q8 has the largest volume among
polyhedra with eight vertices inscribed in the unit sphere, and they derived exact expressions
for its vertex coordinates. In 1934, Michael Goldberg conjectured that P8 has the smallest
volume among polyhedra with eight faces that circumscribe the unit sphere, but no analytic
expressions are known for its coordinates. When the two polyhedra are oriented so that the
axes of rotational symmetry and planes of reflection symmetry of P8 coincide with those
of Q8, the face centroids of P8 are almost coincident with the vertices of Q8. The gap
between the face centroids of P8 and the vertices of Q8 is equal to ~0.04700640080523555
on each quadrilateral face and ~0.003249596513702373 on each pentagonal face. Tiny yellow
dots mark the centroid locations on one pentagonal face and on one quadrilateral face.
In the spring of 2015, I was happily surprised to receive an email from Wayne Deeter, who
informed me that he too had been investigating roundest polyhedra. He had accumulated an
enormous body of results, which he generously sent me, from runs of an optimizing computer
program of his own that he only later discovered is based on an algorithm very similar to
the one I designed for 'Lindelöf', the optimizing program I wrote in FORTRAN in 1986.Lindelöf begins by generating an n-faced polyhedron circumscribed about the unit sphere. The
points on the sphere where the face planes are initially tangent are randomly distributed, but
in every iteration, the faces are appropriately tilted, causing their tangent points to migrate on the
sphere in such directions that the gaps between the face centroids and their tangent points are reduced.
Eventually the face centroids and tangent points coincide nearly exactly. For each value of n, I
anointed the polyhedron with the smallest area (or volume) as the roundest one, but since I
was using a statistical sampling method to generate these polyhedra, my conclusions were
only as good as the statistics would allow. The dramatic increase in computer speed that had
occurred during the 29 years after my 1986 study allowed Wayne to make hundreds or
thousands of times more runs than I made in the interval (4 ≤ n ≤ 47) covered by my study.
It is hardly surprising, therefore, that for one value of n, 38, Wayne discovered a very slightly
rounder polyhedron than the one I had conjectured was roundest.Wayne has enormously expanded the scope of this field by examining polyhedra with far more
faces than any I considered in 1986. This great expansion has enabled him to draw conclusions
regarding many aspects of the problem that — for the first time — have good statistical support.In late 1986, my polyhedra research notebooks were accidentally lost while the contents of my
office were being moved to another building across campus, and they were never recovered.
I then decided to discontinue my computer studies of this problem. But Wayne has generously
allowed me to use his data to reconstruct both graphic images and physical models of the solution
polyhedra I found in 1986 for 4 ≤ n ≤ 47. Wayne will soon publish an article summarizing his results.
The 19th century German geometer Victor Schlegel introduced the use of flat drawings, which are now called
Schlegel diagrams, to represent the combinatorial structure of convex polyhdra. The geometry of such a
projection diagram is illustrated below for the cube. Let us assume that the faces of the cube are opaque
squares but that the face F has been removed so as to provide a peep hole for a [virtual] observer. The station
point is chosen to be so close to F that the interior surface of every cube face except for F itself is visible.
Projection scheme for Schlegel diagram of the cube
Schlegel diagram of the cube
The observer could of course choose instead to locate the station point just outside a particular vertex V
or an edge E. Schlegel diagrams for the cube under these two arrangements are illlustrated below.
Projection scheme for Schlegel diagram of the truncated octahedron
Schlegel diagram of the truncated octahedron
SCHLEGEL DIAGRAMS of conjectured roundest n-faced polyhedra (4 ≤ n ≤ 47)
4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31 32 33
34 35 36 37 38
39 40 41 42 43
44 45 46 47
4, 5, 6, 7
8, 9, 10, 11, 12
13, 13, 14, 15, 15
16, 16, 16, 16
17, 17, 17, 18
19, 20, 21, 22, 23
24, 25, 26, 26
26, 27, 28, 29, 29
30, 30, 30, 30, 31
31, 31, 32, 33, 33
34, 34, 34, 34, 35
36, 36, 37, 38, 39
40, 40, 40, 41, 42
43, 43, 44, 44, 44
45, 46, 46, 47
Below are schlegel diagrams for the 25 faces of the asymmetrical polyhedron P25:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5
6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15
16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25
And here are Schlegel diagrams for the 43 faces of P43:
1-5
6-10
11-15
16-20
21-25
26-30
31-35
36-40
41-43
SCHLEGEL DIAGRAMS AND STEREOSCOPIC IMAGES
OF CONJECTURED ROUNDEST POLYHEDRA FOR 4 ≤ n ≤ 47
(For n = 5, 6, and 7, the sphere-inscribed polyhedra
of maximum volume are also shown for comparison.)
n=4
n=5
n=6
n=7
n=8
n=9
n=10
n=11
n=12
n=13
n=14
n=15
n=16
n=17
n=18
n=19
n=20
n=21
n=22
n=23
n=24
n=25
n=26
n=27
n=28
n=29
n=30
n=31
n=32
n=33
n=34
n=35
n=36
n=37
n=38
n=39
n=40
n=41
n=42
n=43
n=44
n=45
n=46
n=47
P44, probably the roundest polyhedron with 44 faces
1986 IBM Computational Geometry Conference
Yorktown Heights, NYIf you recognize this conferee,
please let me know who she is!
I recall taping the P44 faces together just
the day before the conference. At the
conference, this young lady obligingly
agreed to relieve me of this model
(since it would have been hugely
inconvenient for me to fly home with it).
The problem of roundest polyhedra in R3 asks:
Which n-faced polyhedron has the smallest ratio of S 3/V 2?
(S = surface area and V = volume.)
S 3/V 2 is called the isoperimetric quotient and will be abbreviated
here as I.Q.. Because it is dimensionless, it is independent of scale.In 1897, Minkowski proved that there exists a roundest polyhedron
for every n ≥ 4. In 1899 it was proved by Lorenz Lindelöf that a
necessary condition for a polyhedron P to be roundest is that(i) P circumscribes a sphere,
and
(ii) this sphere is tangent to
the faces of P at their
respective centroids.For a polyhedron circumscribed about the unit sphere, S/V = 27V = 9S.
Hence minimizing S 3/V 2 is equivalent to minimizing S (or V).It has long been conjectured — but never proved — that the roundest
polyhedron is always simple, i.e., that its vertices are all of degree three.
In 1986, I wrote a FORTRAN program called 'Lindelof' that repeatedly
tilts the faces of a polyhedron that circumscribes the sphere until every
face is (almost exactly) tangent to the sphere at its centroid. I'll call this
state TAC (for "tangent at centroid"). The starting polyhedron in each
run was constructed by applying n randomly oriented tangent planes to
the sphere and determinng their intersections (although the program
also accepted pre-designed polyhedra as input). In each iteration, every
face plane was tilted in a direction that would reduce the gap between
its current centroid and its point of tangency. For each n, the polyhedron
found to have the smallest area after a long sequence of tilts was anointed
as the [probable] roundest.
I summarized my results for 4 ≤ n ≤ 35 and for n = 42 in an IBM conference
report:'A Defect-Correction Algorithm for Minimizing the Volume
of a Simple Polyhedron Which Circumscribes a Sphere'and in a May 1986 supplement that describes conjectured solutions for
36 ≤ n ≤ 41 and n = 43. (This supplement includes numerical data derived
from an analysis by William Tutte of the asymptotic number of simple
polyhedra as a function of the number n of faces.)
In August, 1986, I ran Lindelof for the last time and derived solutions
for n = 45, 46, and 47.Below are links to sets of face templates for n = 8, 25, 33, and 44.
You can use these templates to construct physical models of these
examples of conjectured 'roundest' polyhedra. For the case n = 8,
I have provided templates only for faces 1, 2, 3, and 4, since faces
5, 6, 7, and 8 are congruent to faces 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively.For n = 8, 25, and 44, each vertex of the template is labeled by an
integer, but for the case n = 33, each edge is labeled by an integer.template for n = 8: face 1
template for n = 8: face 2
template for n = 8: face 3
template for n = 8: face 4templates for n = 25: ALL faces
templates for n = 33: ALL faces
templates for n = 44: faces 1, 2, 3
templates for n = 44: faces 6, 8, 14
templates for n = 44: faces 7, 9, 10
templates for n = 44: faces 5, 11, 12, 34
templates for n = 44: faces 13, 15, 16
templates for n = 44: faces 17, 18, 41
templates for n = 44: faces 19, 20, 44
templates for n = 44: faces 21, 22, 23
templates for n = 44: faces 4, 24, 26
templates for n = 44: faces 25, 31, 33
templates for n = 44: faces 27, 28, 29, 30
templates for n = 44: faces 35, 36, 37
templates for n = 44: faces 32, 38, 40
templates for n = 44: faces 39, 42, 43
The polyhedron P33, which I have conjectured is the
roundest polyhedron with 33 faces, is composed of
one heptagon (green), thirteen pentagons (yellow),
and nineteen hexagons (red-orange).29 of the 33 faces of P33 define a connected assembly
with the same combinatorial structure as the faces of
the 'soccer ball' polyhedron (truncated icosahedron).Below is a Schlegel diagram of P33:
To view a sequence of eight rotated images of P33,
set the magnification at 80%.
I thank Joseph Malkevitch, who is himself a prolific geometer,
Joseph Malkovitchfor his 2015 article about the work of Victor Klee.
My own interest in roundest polyhedra was kindled in 1972 when I first saw Klee's
two films about geometry, 'Shapes of the Future — Some Unsolved Problems
in Geometry'. Shortly afterwards Prof. Klee (1925-2007) gave me copies of the filmscript
booklets for these two films, Part I: Two Dimensions and Part II: Three Dimensions.
With the permission of the Mathematical Association of America, I have made
digital copies of these films and uploaded them to YouTube:Part I: Two Dimensions (YouTube video)
and
Part II: Three Dimensions. (YouTube video)I met Michael Goldberg several times at AMS meetings in the late sixties. We
discussed minimal surfaces and Voronoi polyhedra, but unfortunately he never
brought up the subject of roundest polyhedra, in which I had a growing interest.
Like Victor Klee, Michael was an unusually modest man. I greatly regret that
he never mentioned to me either of his groundbreaking publications about polyhedra:'The Isoperimetric Problem for Polyhedra' (1934)
and
'A Class of Multisymmetric Polyhedra' (1937).In 1985 I discovered Goldberg's 1935 article, but only in 1991, when I bought
Ian Stewart's wonderfully witty book about mathematics, "Game, Set, and Math",
did I learn of Michael's 1937 article introducing what are now called Goldberg
polyhedra, a class of polyhedra based on the regular icosahedron.Donald Caspar and Aaron Klug independently rediscovered Goldberg polyhedra
in 1962. They are related to the structure of several common viruses and are described
in the Caspar-Klug publication, "Physical Principles in the Construction of Regular
Viruses", Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 27, pp. 1-24 (cf. VIRUSWORLD).
Front view of P44
Rear view of P44
Schlegel diagram of P44, centered on the back of the polyhedron.
In the near future, I plan to compute — and display here — examples of nets,
for the benefit of those who prefer to use them for the construction of models,
instead of using individual polygon templates.
Tetsuya Hatanaka and the P44 model
he assembled in Spring, 2011
In 2011, I constructed a new model of P44, using the face templates I
made in 1986. Below is a cross-eyed stereo pair of photos of this model.
Identifying its D2d symmetry required careful scrutiny of the model!
The model I constructed in 2011 of P44, the putative 'roundest'
polyhedron with 44 faces (identfied in 1986). Its symmetry is D2d.Below is a stereo image of a simpler convex polyhedron with D2d
symmetry. It has the simplest possible combinatorial structure of all
convex polyhedra with D2d symmetry. It is shown inscribed in a
cube of edge length two. One of its two orthogonal c2 axes is the
blue line, which coincides with the x-axis. The other c2 axis is the
red line, which coincides with the line between points at 0,1,1)
and (0,-1,-1).
P44 also has two orthogonal planes of mirror symmetry, the horizontal
(equatorial) x-y plane and the vertical x-z plane. It is invariant under two
successive rotations—a half-turn about the [vertical] z-axis, followed by
a quarter-turn about the [horizontal] x-axis.Like the convex hexahedron shown above, if P44 is viewed from the
back, it appears the same as it does from the front, except for the fact
that its image is rotated by a quarter-turn.My 1986 conference paper on roundest polyhedra lists only two other
values of n — 8 and 20 — for which the roundest n-faced polyhedron
has D2d symmetry (cf. pp. 162-164).Although a separate template is provided here for each of the forty-four
faces of P44 (cf. above), there are only eight different shapes of faces —
two pentagons (p1 and p2) and six hexagons (h1, h2, ..., h6). The number
of specimens and the symmetry of each face are given below. Each of the
asymmetrical face shapes occurs in two four-specimen subsets. The faces in
one of these subsets are reflected images of the faces in the other subset.pentagons
4 p1: d2 symmetry
8 p2: c1 symmetry (i.e. asymmetric)hexagons
4 h1: d2 symmetry
4 h2: d2 symmetry
4 h3: d2 symmetry
4 h4: d2 symmetry
8 h5: c1 symmetry
8 h6: c1 symmetryThe results described in my 1986 conference paper and in the May 1986
supplement demonstrate that roundest polyhedra exhibit a great variety
of symmetries. Determining the symmetry of each of these polyhedra is
an interesting challenge. It is probably best accomplished by examining,
from different directions, either physical models or — more simply! —
virtual models, using a computer program like Mathematica, for example.In 1989, my student David M. Aubertin wrote a computer science masters thesis
in which he designed and implemented a program for obtaining and displaying
solutions for the 4-dimensional version of the isoperimetric problem for polyhedra.
Here is a hyperlink to his thesis, which is entitled'Optimization of Four-Dimensional Polytopes'.
It contains numerous stereoscopic perspective drawings of projections into R3 of the
solution 4-polytopes. It also includes a listing of the elegantly structured FORTRAN
program Dave wrote for this study, together with a short BASIC program for
displaying the perspective images. He has informed me that you are quite welcome
to copy and run these programs.
Cloud City, a sculpture by Tomas Saraceno Photographed by Reiko Takasawa Schoen on October 20, 2012
at the New York City Metropolitan Musem of Art
Below are a few examples of Schlegel diagrams of sphere-inscribed
polyhedra of maximum volume for a given number of vertices. I
constructed all except for the simplest of these Schlegel diagrams from
polyhedron vertex data generously shared with me by Wayne Deeter.
n=4
n=5
n=6
n=7
n=8
n=9
n=10
n=11
n=12
n=13
n=14
n=15
n=16
n=17
n=18
n=19
n=20
n=21
n=22
Q22 is composed of 40 triangles of 10 distinct shapes.
There are 4 specimens of each shape.
front view rear view wireframe
Schlegel diagram of a 36-face subset of Q22
viewed along a diad axis
Star-like Schlegel diagram of Q22
viewed along a diad axis
Schlegel diagram of Q22
viewed along a 'quasi-diad axis'
n=23Q23 is composed of 42 triangles of 7 distinct shapes.
There are 6 specimens of each shape,
coded by color in the image below.
c3-symmetric Schlegel diagram of
a 36-face subset of the 42 faces of Q23
Symmetrical Schlegel diagram of S23(2),
a second 36-face subset of the 42 faces of Q23
c3-symmetric star-like Schlegel diagram of Q23
front view rear view wireframe
Q42
n=72
c3-symmetric Schlegel diagram of Q72
no. of pink faces = 20
no. of gold faces = 60
no. of green faces = 60
f = no. of faces = 140
e = no. of edges = 3f /2
= 210
v = no. of vertices
Euler's equation: v - e + f = 2
Hence v = e - f + 2
= 72
c3-symmetric Schlegel diagram of Q72
c2-symmetric Schlegel diagram of Q72
c2-symmetric Schlegel diagram of Q72
n=122
Schlegel diagram of a 235-face subset of the 240 triangular
faces of Q122, which is the dual of a Goldberg polyhedron.
Q122 is composed of 240 triangles of 3 distinct shapes. It is
composed of 60 specimens each of both the largest and smallest
triangles and 120 specimens of the triangle of intermediate size.
Star-like Schlegel diagram of Q122. It includes the
five faces omitted from the diagram shown just above.
(Click here for a higher resolution image.)
Q122no. of pink faces = 60
no. of red faces = 60
no. of yellow faces = 120
f = no. of faces = 240
e = no. of edges = 3f /2
= 360
v = no. of vertices
Euler's equation: v - e + f = 2
Hence v = e - f + 2
= 122
Q122 wireframe
c2-symmetric Schlegel diagram of Q130
Back to GEOMETRY GARRET